{"id":4960,"date":"2025-04-22T08:51:52","date_gmt":"2025-04-22T15:51:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.visla.us\/blog\/?p=4960"},"modified":"2025-04-22T08:51:53","modified_gmt":"2025-04-22T15:51:53","slug":"copyright-law-and-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.visla.us\/blog\/news\/copyright-law-and-ai\/","title":{"rendered":"Copyright Law & AI: What Every Business Should Know"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

AI is poised to change everything. Tools like ChatGPT, image generators, and AI-powered video makers are giving creators and businesses powerful new ways to make things faster, cheaper, and sometimes even better. But all that innovation comes with a catch: we\u2019re still figuring out how U.S. copyright law applies to it all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And the truth? It\u2019s messy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How copyright works (and how AI gets involved)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

First, a refresher. U.S. copyright law<\/a> protects original works of authorship. This includes books, movies, music, images, code, and more. If you create something, you get the exclusive right to copy, adapt, and distribute it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But there are some exceptions, like fair use<\/a>, which allows limited use of copyrighted content without permission for things like commentary, criticism, teaching, or research. Fair use is judged based on a four-factor test<\/a>, which looks at things like how much content is used, whether the use is transformative, and the effect on the original work\u2019s market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s where AI complicates things.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most generative AI systems are trained on massive amounts of data scraped from the internet. That data includes books, images, songs, code, news articles, and more, many of which are copyrighted. So the big questions are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Is it legal to use copyrighted content to train an AI model?<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Who owns the stuff the AI creates?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    The legal gray areas (and courtroom battles)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Let\u2019s take the first question: is it okay to use copyrighted work to train AI?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Tech companies say yes, because they argue training is \u201ctransformative<\/a>,\u201d like teaching a human artist by showing them examples. They also claim it falls under fair use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Creators and rights holders strongly disagree. They say this is copying on a massive scale, often for commercial gain, without permission or payment. Dozens of lawsuits have been filed against companies like OpenAI, Meta, Stability AI, and Anthropic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Some key cases to know:<\/p>\n\n\n\n